I must not politics. Politics is the mind killer. Politics is the little death that brings total obliteration twitter.com/jeff82874662/s…

New feature for the Query Builder extension! You could now create Query Pages! Borrowing ideas from the Discourse Graph extension, create far more flexible queries than the native component to generate table views of your data: roamjs.com/extensions/que…

Motivation fades. Habits are forever. - @joserosado

"Never discourage anyone who continually makes progress, no matter how slow." - Plato

吕立青的漫游日报，
每天分享我的阅读。
有趣、有料、有用，
随时、随心、随意。
🌝🌕🌖🌗🌘🌑🌚

当然，还可以通过 Webhook 转发到飞书话题群 1. 飞书提供 Webhook 机器人 🤖 2. 设置 Bot 然后加入话题群即可 3. IFTTT 提供 Web Request 作为 THAT 4. 设置转发 POST 请求到对应 Webhook 地址

2.3 另一个大师是查理芒格，如果看过《穷查理宝典》就知道查理芒格完全就是一个书痴，什么时候都在看书，他推荐的书单肯定也是极为靠谱的。 fs.blog/2014/06/charli…

2.4 如何快速找到某个人推荐的书单？ 非常简单，直接 Google 搜索：books recommended by xxx 就可以了，例如我想看一下 Tim Ferriss 推荐的书，那么直接搜索 books recommended by Tim Ferriss 就有结果了。 google.com/search?newwind…

2.8 很多人应该都有「买书如山倒，看书如抽丝」的经验，Farnam Street 把这种行为成为「Anti Library」，即那些你买了没有看的书。 这些书有什么意义呢？ 1）灵感，有些时候光看一下书脊上的标题就可以激发思考和灵感； 2）幸福感，如果能够拥有一面书墙，想想都是一件觉得很信服的事。

出现这种现象的可能原因： 1. 文档写的太长太复杂，开发者实在看不懂或没时间看。 2. 文档不好被搜索到，SEO 方面做不过 StackOverflow。 3. 文档并非直接面向问题的，导致从问题描述搜索不到。 4. 文档写的太简单。如 Clojure 的文档有这个毛病，光看描述难看懂，但它提供了很多用户提交的例子。 twitter.com/the_greatbonni…

@Conaw @josephmwood @codexeditor @FrancescoD_Ales @fortelabs One option is to interview users of apps who actually do serious work. You might get more views peddling productivity porn, but you’ll only hurt your audience twitter.com/Conaw/status/1…

@Conaw @josephmwood @codexeditor Switching thinking apps is great way to avoid responsibility of thinking. Productivity is a mindless idol and escape from hard work and hard questions. I recommend building something with love to help people you can talk to…

@camilomoresala @fortelabs Graph was a weekend hackathon that helped people from conceptual model. I do think Obsidian took that feature much further, hear it’s good for teachers planning courses 🤷